Archive for the '"Real" things' Category

I know it’s terrible, but I’m not going to lie

Posted by eugene on June 4th, 2008

I want to try it.  The Hardee’s Prime Rib Thickburger, the latest in the line of Thickburgers.

The St. Louis-based fast-food chain’s latest menu addition, available as of Wednesday, is the Prime Rib Thickburger. The sandwich - 780 calories and 48 grams of fat - will have a suggested price of $4.49, or $6.49 with fries and a drink.

“We’ve never been ones to follow the fast-food herd mentality,” said Brad Haley, vice president of marketing for Hardee’s.

The Prime Rib Thickburger is almost health food compared to some Hardee’s offerings - the chain offers four sandwiches with more than 1,000 calories, most famously the Monster Thickburger with 1,420 calories and 108 grams of fat.

That’s right!  F the herd.  Even if the herd is going toward health.  Bring on the 2k calorie burger!

The Federal government can’t afford Excel 2007?  And, umm, Excel’s considered a more powerful database application?  I mean I guess versus earlier versions or something.

FEC, media can’t handle Obama jackpot - Kenneth P. Vogel - Politico.com

If you want to comb through Obama or Clinton’s cash, you either need to divide and import their reports section-by-section a time-consuming and mind-numbing process or purchase a more powerful database application, such as Microsoft Access or Microsoft Excel 2007, both of which retail for $229.

I know MS has deals in place to give some colleges/universities MS software for $5/disc, maybe the government cuts them a break on antitrust fines or something and MS gives them a newer office suite.

I wonder in what format/program Obama sent the information to the FEC.

I really dislike Olbermann a little

Posted by eugene on May 24th, 2008

He’s good.  He’s the left’s Bill O’Reilly, though in no way as ridiculous.  And I like his rants and whatnot.  He’s gone off on Hillary a few times.  The latest was after the whole RFK assassination stuff.

 

But I have to say, and I have no idea how long he’s done it, hell maybe since day one (I don’t watch regularly), I find Olbermann’s use of “good night and good luck”, aping of Edward R. Murrow a little off-putting. As much as he might be a hero/idol/etc., it just seems a little pretentious.

Early daily photo project

Posted by eugene on May 23rd, 2008

I found this via alltop.  Jamie Livingston took a Polaroid daily from March 31, 1979 to October 25, 1997 (his 41st birthday and also the day he died).

The actual site of the photographs and some other links about it:

Mental Floss (with some of the photos)

Only the Blog Knows Brooklyn has a lot of information about the pictures and the accompanying exhibit.

Jamie Livingston’s wiki page.

 

John Yoo in Esquire

Posted by eugene on May 22nd, 2008

Reading it, he seems reasonable and his approach to the questions presented to him seem reasonable as well.  I don’t know how I’d answer the question, but I agree with him that to write the legal opinion is to draw a bright line, especially in this instance and not about the moral ambiguity of the acts they lead to.

Is John Yoo a Monster - Esquire.com

A follow-up in Esquire.

McCain is loved and hated by me

Posted by eugene on May 20th, 2008

Did McCain screw himself when he promoted speedy adoption of HDTV? - By Timothy Noah - Slate Magazine

McCain as the cause of HD penetration is a reason I’d like him.  Though I’d just as likely have HD now without him.  And due to SDV and TiVo I don’t get many of the HD channels.

But funny that HD might be downfall.  And I could totally see it doing so.

Advice for parents

Posted by eugene on May 13th, 2008

Awhile back I wrote a post on the challenges of raising kids if you’re wealthy.  Well here’s a list of 10 things kids should receive from their parents from the WSJ by Peter White, a rich guy who counsels rich people.  This list was presented to rich people on how to raise their kids.

1. Necessaries
2. Affection
3. Affirmation and Support
4. Boundaries
5. Guidance
6. Respect
7. Trust
8. Forgiveness
9. Religion or Spirituality
10. Letting Go

Yeah so it doesn’t so much seem like a list for rich people as it is a list for parents in general.

The list isn’t just for rich parents. But as Peter told me, it’s helpful for wealthy parents to learn that “the first thing to be concerned with is loving children in a way that enables them to take charge of their lives as adults, so they can use wealth to enhance, not diminish, their lives.”

Rich people need to learn these 10 things?  I’d be annoyed if I was rich and someone told me these 10 things were necessary to not raise some dilletante, like I didn’t know these basic kinds of parenting principles.

Warren Buffett, as usual, has a pretty good handle on it:

“[The perfect amount of money to leave children is] enough money so that they would feel they could do anything, but not so much that they could do nothing.”

Of course that doesn’t address a rich kid getting spoiled by having all the best things and thinking that he/she somehow is entitled to all of that.  But for tips on that the first link (my original post) has stuff about that.  Not from me, but from whatever I linked to in that piece.  I’m poor, so I wouldn’t know about these things.

Delegate math

Posted by eugene on May 4th, 2008

Super edit: Apparently I’ve read wrong.  I just checked and the 4047/2025 numbers are with Michigan and Florida already stripped of delegates.  Not that it matters much as Obama’s performance yesterday has pretty much sealed the deal.

Alright, political post.  I’ve posted some before.  A little more light-hearted (come on, even Hillary supporters HAVE to love how cute “Baracky” is.  Just a great bit of animation.  I’d have liked it if it was a Hillary ad.  It’s just clever.) but here’s one a little more substantive.

Delegate math.  I don’t understand how this is still an issue.  How it’s still a “race”.  (It’s a joke and it’s perpetuated by the media and Hillary’s manipulation of the media in order to keep the story and her campaign afloat.)  Lest you say I’m just some blind Obama-maniac here’s the math.

Obama has it in the bag no matter what your math is.

Here’s the wiki on democratic nom delegates needed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2008

So 2024 (simple majority, it’s actually 2023.5 is divided by 2, so 2024 is what wiki uses, most media sources take the rounded number and add 1 to get the oft reported 2025) needed via everyone-counts-including-the-rule-breaking-states map.

But Florida and Michigan didn’t follow party rules and were stripped of delegates!  Everyone agreed to do so, including one Mrs. Hillary Clinton (I’m not even LINKING to her agreeing to it wholeheartedly since it’s been reported so much).  So 4047 total minus 313 for FL and MI (delegates only, supers not counted) = 3734 / 2 =  1867 +1 = 1868 to win the Democratic nomination.
Per wiki currently Obama has 1739.5.  Hillary has 1609.5.

So Obama is short 128.5 and Hillary is short 258.5

Remaining Democratic primaries:

  • May 6 - Indiana - 72 delegates
  • May 6 - North Carolina - 115 delegates
  • May 13 - West Virginia - 28 delegates
  • May 20 - Kentucky - 51 delegates
  • May 20 - Oregon - 52 delegates
  • June 3 - Montana - 16 delegates
  • June 3 - South Dakota - 15 delegates
  • June 7 - Puerto Rico - 55 delegates

That’s 352 delegates up for grabs.  Let’s assume (here’s where I’m sure I’ll get attacked, but for argument’s sake) the primaries remaining go 51 to 49 for Barack.  Look this is a pretty safe bet.  Barack will win some by bigger.  Hillary will win some.  But on average things are going Barack’s way.  Per CNN it’s 45% Obama, 43% Clinton, 12% undecided.  Split the undecided and you have 51/49.  (You can argue that undecideds tend to go more for Hillary than Obama, but given the remaining primaries left, I think 51/49 is fair).  So divide 352 remaining by 2 add 1 for simple majority = 177.  So if the rest of the primaries went 51 to 49 for Obama, that’s 1916.5 for Obama versus 1786.5 for Hillary.  So Obama wins.

Say you feel bad for Florida and Michigan.  And you don’t want to “disenfranchise” them (whether or not they are actually disenfranchised is another thing.  And I do have sympathy for Democrats in those states for various reasons).  So let’s seat them.  But given the rules were agreed to and given Obama was not even on the ballot in Michigan, we’ll split them down the middle.  (A point of contention I know, but that we’re even going to consider seating them is ridiculous, so 50/50 is what I’m going with.)  So 313 delegates from the two states.  Divide by two is 156.5.  Add that to Obama’s current estimate (via wiki as stated above) of 1739.5 equals 1896 delegates.  Add the 51/49 split of remaining primaries (177) and that gives you 2073 delegates for Obama, which is more than the 2025 needed.  And Hillary loses with 1943.

So unless Obama is caught smoking crack while killing a high priced prostitute or something beyond all realms of imagination, the Democrats have a nominee.  Of course Hillary won’t stand for it.  And is arguing she’ll take it to the credentialing committee and all sorts of nonsense.  Meanwhile John McCain sits back and gets by.  All of the things Obama is being attacked on (by Hillary, then echoed by McCain) are all things you can find in McCain’s circle (and Hillary’s for that matter).  But McCain  (and Hillary because Obama doesn’t campaign like that.  I’m sure people can point to some things Obama has done that are “old” politics, but let’s be real, Hillary has basically tried to swift-boat him on EVERY little thing) gets a pass because everyone’s focused on the Democratic process right now.

And don’t even get me started on this RIDICULOUS gas tax holiday stuff.  Just a few links for that:

Gas Tax Holiday Savings calculator.  I save something like $2 total.

Some thing from The Economist: How do I hate thee, gas-tax holiday?

I’m not going to link to all the other news organizations, blogs, media in general that say the gas tax holiday is a bad idea.  I’m not going to link to all the other news organizations, blogs, media in general searching in vain for a SINGLE expert not associated with the campaigns in favor of the gas tax holiday.  It’s too many to even start.  The gas tax holiday support is the same as the climate change stuff.  It’s basically a consensus.  Experts who “doubt” human-caused climate change are usually on a payroll.  Experts who claim gas tax holiday is good and helpful are also on a payroll.

Edit: I’m all for primaries counting.  Clearly more primaries must happen for Obama to achieve the magic 2025 number.  But to say it’s a contest is ridiculous.  Obama has it basically sewn up, save the aforementioned catastrophic event.  The remaining primaries, while needed for the actual number, are more like a formality.  I mean Republicans have primaries left (May 6: Indiana (57) and North Carolina (69); May 17: Hawaii (20); May 20: Kentucky (45) and Oregon (30); May 27: Idaho (32); June 3: New Mexico (32) and South Dakota (27); July 12: Nebraska (33)) too.  Of course with the winner takes all approach, McCain hit the Republican number to clinch already.  But the primaries still happen.  Even more of a mere formality than the Democrats.  But it’s basically the same thing.

What’s next

Posted by eugene on May 2nd, 2008

RFK Jr.’s piece on climate change in Vanity Fair.

Carbon dependence has eroded our economic power, destroyed our moral authority, diminished our international influence and prestige, endangered our national security, and damaged our health and landscapes. It is subverting everything we value.

Read it all here.

I LOVE “Yes We Can”

Posted by eugene on April 22nd, 2008

But Baracky is officially the best Barack video out.